Site Home :> About Us :> Privacy of Info :> Terms of Service :> Add Your Link :> Submit Article
Search:   
acclaimedlist.com acclaimedlist.com
Multiple links exchange
 
 

Music & Entertainment

 

Internet & Computers

 

Research & Science

 

Self Healing

 

Government & Politics

 

Society & Communities

 

Tour & Travel

 

Education & Reference

 

Issues & News

 

Malls & Shopping

 

Children & Teens

 

Companies & Business

 

Jobs & Employment

 

Fitness & Health

 

Relationship & Lifestyle

 

Creative Arts

 

Estate & Realty

 

Sports & Adventure

 

Automobile & Automotive

 

Games & Play

 

Family & Home

 

Banking & Finance

 

Medicine & Treatment

 

Eating & Drinking

 

  Site Home » Sports & Adventure » Tennis
   
 

Tennis Champions: Are They Born? Or Made?

   
John Newcombe, former world tennis No 1 and former Australian Davis Cup captain, once said that the top Australian players of his era believed that it was their destiny to become tennis champions.

Boris Becker told me that two weeks before achieving his first Wimbledon title (in 1985 when seventeen years old), he felt as if it were predetermined.

As a seventeen year old, Ivan Lendl, who, prior to Pete Sampras, held the No 1 spot longer than any other player in history, was convinced that he would turn himself into the best player in the world. He would even tell you so.

When asked by the media about his chances of winning his first US Open title (in 1975), Jimmy Connors' response was: "There are 127 losers in the draw -- and me!"
Jimmy won.

What these former greats had in common was an unshakeable certainty that they would win. It is a trait that is shared by all top sports people.

But a question that has always fascinated me is: Are such champions born, or are they made?

Were Newccombe, Becker, Lendl and Connors born to rule the tennis world? Or did they become champions because of the choices they made? Was their success predetermined, as suggested by Newcombe and Becker? Or was it a result of a single-minded dedication to making themselves the very best, as implied by Lendl and Connors?

Are champions a product of nature? Or of nurture?

To be a true champion at tennis or any other sport requires very special qualities. These qualities or attributes can be divided into two categories -- the physical and the mental. It is my contention that physical attributes are predominantly a product of chance. They are determined genetically.

For instance, some people are born with a body structure conducive to speed, others to strength, and so on. In this sense, a very large proportion of the population are excluded, from birth, from ever winning an Olympic gold medal as a sprinter or a weightlifter.

It is the same with tennis. The physical attributes that are required to become a champion player are such things as good hand-eye coordination, quick reflexes, and leg-speed. Without question, these attributes can be developed to their fullest potential with hard work and effective training methods.

But most people are excluded from becoming the best tennis player in the world, no matter how much time they spend attempting to reach their physical ceiling of potential.

Does this mean, then, that champions are born? Were Newcombe, Becker, Lendl and Connors so physically superior to everyone else that becoming the best was just a mere formality?

Certainly not. All four were exceptionally gifted physically, but in my view, there were other players of the same eras who were more gifted than they were.

What separated them from everyone else were their mental attributes: their will to win, their determination, their perseverance, their ability to remain calm under presuure, their ability to bounce back from disappointments, and the belief that they deserved to win -- all attributes that not one of us is born with, but that each one of us has the power to develop. The only choice is whether we want to or not.

It is in this sense that, given the necessary or essential physical attributes as a starting point, all champions are not only made -- they are self-made.

Author: Chris Lewis
 
Author Bio:

Copyright 2006 -- A parent of three young children who are homeschooled according to Montessori principles, Chris is a former Number 1 ranked junior tennis player in the world (1975) and Wimbledon finalist (1983). When not discussing children's education, you will find him on a tennis court in Southern California, where he now resides. You can read more of Chris's articles and tennis tips at his website, Expert Tennis Tips.

This article can be searched using: Tennis Champions: Are They Born? Or Made?, Sports & Adventure, Tennis, tennis racket
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
A Golf Stretching DVD Needs A Strength Component For Best Results
 
Bamboo Fly Rods - A Timeless Tradition
 
Teaching a Kid to Fish
 
You've Gotta Make Time For Golf
 
Lake Erie Smallmouth Bass Fishing
 
Golf Energy for focus and concentration
 
Buffalo Sabres: Ticketnest
 
Learning Golf at Golf Schools
 
Boat Buying Tips
 
How To Find The Best Bicycle Frame Looking Beyond Its Paint
 
 
 
 
 

Kayak Accessories.

The essential kayak accessories. - Peter Lenkefi
 

Play Golf in Bansko, Bulgaria

Golf in Bansko, Bulgaria is a great activity to do during the warmer months. Find out why... - Mal Keenan
 

The Sport of Airsoft vs. The Sport of Paintball Part I

Why The Sport of Airsoft? Why The Sport of Paintball? Why not both? Take a breif look into the simul ... - PJ Ace
 
 

Purpose Of Fishing Rod Holders

Fishing is a sport designed for relaxation. It is where fish lovers pride themselves of the fish cau ... - Travis Clemens
 

Pocket Bikes ?C Miniature Form Of Motorbikes

Pocket bikes, also known as mini motors are miniature-sized motorcycles, fueled with either gas or o ... - Sharon Albright
 
 
Site Home :> Privacy of Info :> Terms of Service  
© 2008 www.acclaimedlist.com All Rights Reserved.